Occupy protests disrupt ports across US West Coast

Hundreds of anti-Wall Street protesters have blocked gates and delayed lorries at three ports on the US West Coast.

The partial shutdown of harbours in California, Oregon and Washington states resulted in a handful of arrests, but no major clashes.

From early on Monday, activists picketed gates, beat drums and carried signs with slogans such as "Shut Down Wall St on the Waterfront".

The rallies come a month after police dismantled Occupy camps across the US.

Demonstrators said they hoped to hit the profits of the corporations that run the harbours.

'Mission accomplished'

In Oakland, California, about 150 workers were sent home as a result of the demonstrations, effectively closing two terminals.

Scott Olsen, the Marine veteran who was injured during a clash between police and Occupy Oakland protesters in October, joined nearly 1,000 people marching to the city's port on Monday evening.

At Long Beach port, near Los Angeles, up to 300 protesters rallied at a terminal facility and scuffled with police.

Two terminals were also shut in Portland, Oregon, where two people carrying a gun and a sword were arrested. Occupy spokeswoman Kari Koch said they were not affiliated with the rallies.

Workers in Portland and at the port of Longview, Washington, were sent home over health and safety concerns.

The longshoremen's union did not officially back the protests, but employees were allowed to stay off the job if they felt conditions were unsafe.

Demonstrators have previously targeted companies such as port operator SSA Marine, in which Goldman Sachs holds a large stake, and grain exporter EGT.

In Vancouver, Canada, about a dozen people protested at that city's port and a handful of people in Anchorage, in the US state of Alaska, also held a demonstration.

Monday's demonstrations were the largest co-ordinated action by the Occupy movement since encampments were removed in cities across the US in recent weeks.

Although they attracted far fewer people than the 10,000 who turned out at the beginning of November to shut Oakland's port, organisers declared victory.

Protester Boots Riley said. "We shut down the Port of Oakland for the daytime shift and we're coming back in the evening. Mission accomplished."

But others said the action would hurt workers.

"Disrupting port activities makes it harder for US manufacturing, the farm community and countless others to sell to customers and contribute to our nation's economic recovery," said EGT chief executive Larry Clarke.

And Christian Vega, 32, who was stuck with a lorry-load of recycled paper at the port of Oakland, said the disruption would cost him several hundred dollars.

"It only hurts me and the other drivers," he told the Associated Press news agency.

"We have jobs and families to support and feed. Most of them [protesters] don't."

 

China's president promises to increase trade imports

China's President Hu Jintao has promised to increase imports, in an effort to boost global trade.

Speaking on the tenth anniversary of China's entry into the World Trade Organization, Mr Hu said annual imports would exceed $8 trillion (£639bn) in the next five years.

Last year, China bought only $1.39tn worth of products from overseas.

Customs data shows the country's exports rose by 14% in November, while imports rose by 22%.

The pace of growth has slowed from October as trade with Europe, which is China's largest business partner, moderated.

Balancing trade

With anaemic economic expansion in Europe and America, there is even more pressure on China, the world's second-biggest economy, to boost consumption at home.

Mr Hu said on Sunday that Beijing was serious about pursuing balance in its trade policy, adding that it would bring opportunities to countries around the world.

"We will view expansion of imports as an important way to change the development mode of foreign trade," he said at a speech at the Great Hall of the People.

"We will work hard to promote a balanced international balance of payments. We will not deliberately pursue a trade surplus."

China's trade surplus, a persistent source of tension with its trading partners, narrowed to $14.5bn last month, from $17bn in October.

 

Clegg warns European veto 'bad for Britain'

Deputy Prime Minister Nick Clegg says David Cameron's veto of EU treaty changes was "bad for Britain" and could leave it "isolated and marginalised".

But he blamed French and German "intransigence" and pressure from Eurosceptic Conservatives for putting the PM in "a very difficult position".

Initially Mr Clegg said the coalition was united over the use of the veto.

But he told the BBC he had "made it clear" to Mr Cameron it was "untenable" for him to welcome the move.

Sources close to Mr Clegg have told the BBC he "couldn't believe it" when he was told the summit in Brussels had "spectacularly unravelled".

The prime minister blocked changes to the EU's Lisbon Treaty at an EU summit, arguing that the proposed changes were not in the UK's interest.

It now looks likely that all 26 other members of the European Union will agree to a new "accord" setting out tougher budget rules aimed at preventing a repeat of the current eurozone crisis.

'Bitterly disappointed'

As leader of the Liberal Democrats, Mr Clegg is far more pro-European than his Conservative coalition colleagues.

He told the BBC's Andrew Marr programme: "I'm bitterly disappointed by the outcome of last week's summit, precisely because I think now there is a danger that the UK will be isolated and marginalised within the European Union.

"I don't think that's good for jobs, in the City or elsewhere, I don't think it's good for growth or for families up and down the country."

He said he would now be doing "everything I can to ensure this setback does not become a permanent divide".

The deputy PM said he had learned of the veto in a phone call from the prime minister at 0400 GMT, shortly before Mr Cameron gave a press conference announcing it publicly.

Asked what his reaction had been, the Lib Dem leader said: "I said this was bad for Britain.

"I made it clear that it was untenable for me to welcome it."

'Unacceptable' demands

The new accord will hold eurozone members to strict budgetary rules including:

  • a cap of 0.5% of GDP on countries' annual structural deficits
  • "automatic consequences" for countries whose public deficit exceeds 3% of GDP
  • a requirement to submit their national budgets to the European Commission, which will have the power to request that they be revised

Mr Cameron has said he was seeking certain "safeguards" from Europe on protection of the single market and the UK's financial services industry.

But French President Nicolas Sarkozy called those demands "unacceptable".

Mr Clegg said unwillingness to negotiate from France and Germany, combined with "outright antagonism to all things European" from parts of the Conservative Party, had left Mr Cameron in a difficult position.

"He couldn't come back to London empty-handed because self evidently, if he'd done so, he wouldn't have been able to get whatever had been agreed through the House of Commons so all we would have had would have been a delayed crisis."

On Friday, a spokesman for Mr Clegg said he had been "consulted throughout" the 10 hours of unsuccessful negotiations in Brussels - a claim backed up by Foreign Secretary William Hague.

He told the BBC the Lib Dem leader was fully "signed up" to the decision to veto the proposed treaty.

'Better way forward'

Mr Cameron will make a statement in the House of Commons on his decision on Monday - and the Labour leader called on him to use it to "explain why he did something that was so bad for Britain and bad for British jobs".

"He did this because the Eurosceptic wing of the Conservative Party has effectively taken over and that isn't good for the national interest," Ed Miliband said.

"What I say to Liberal Democrats and others is that we will work with anybody who thinks this position cannot stand. We must find a better way forward for Britain."

Mr Hague insisted Britain was "not marginalised", and told Sky News that while "everybody knows" that the Tories and Lib Dems had different views on Europe, the negotiating position taken by Mr Cameron "was agreed in advance" with Mr Clegg's party.

But Lib Dem peer Lord Oakeshott said his party's Business Secretary Vince Cable had "given a very serious warning last Monday in the cabinet against elevating these financial regulation points into a make or break deal".

Asked about Labour's allegation that Mr Cameron did not genuinely want to reach a deal in Brussels, Lord Oakeshott told the BBC's Politics Show he believed "a walk-out quite suited him".

Mr Cameron and his Chancellor George Osborne have insisted the veto was in part to protect the City of London from excessive intervention by Europe, but Labour and the UK Independence Party have both warned that actually no additional safeguards for it were achieved.

 

Page 4 of 178

«StartPrev12345678910NextEnd»

Copyright Radio Turks & Caicos 2010 | Designed and maintained by NVARD